Assessment and roadmap
Best when you need a clear diagnosis before committing to implementation.
- Current-state review for Competitive teardown
- Risks, gaps, and dependencies
- Prioritised scope and next-step plan
BUILD PRODUCTS · MARKET RESEARCH
We buy the three closest competitors, take them apart, and document construction, materials, part count and likely landed cost.
Service overview
We buy the three closest competitors, take them apart, and document construction, materials, part count and likely landed cost.
To learn what your competitors actually cost to make, and where they cut corners you could exploit.
Anyone entering a category with established incumbents, particularly where the leading product is visibly imperfect.
We buy the three closest competitors at retail, dismantle them, and document part count, materials, fastening method, assembly time and likely tooling. That gets converted into an estimated unit cost.
A costed picture of what you are competing against, and a shortlist of specific weaknesses to design against rather than guesses.
Not useful for genuinely new categories with no comparable product. In that case demand research is the better spend.
Before tooling money gets spent, we find out whether the thing should exist.
This service can be engaged independently or connected to a broader product-development programme spanning research, design, engineering, prototyping, sourcing, manufacturing, packaging, and launch.
How the engagement works
The exact scope changes by project, but each engagement is organised around evidence, written criteria, review points, and clear ownership of the resulting files or systems.
Confirm the product objective, constraints, current files, and the role Competitive teardown needs to play.
Review the evidence, requirements, risks, suppliers, and dependencies connected to Market research.
Create the production-intent work for Competitive teardown and coordinate it with adjacent disciplines.
Review against the written criteria, test the critical assumptions, and document revisions before approval.
Deliver and review the agreed outputs: Teardown report with photos and cost estimate. Then confirm ownership and the next production step.
Ways to engage
These are flexible scope models rather than fixed-price plans. They make it easier to decide whether you need diagnosis, implementation, or a connected programme.
Best when you need a clear diagnosis before committing to implementation.
Best when the objective is defined and you need the work produced and delivered.
Best when this service must stay coordinated with design, engineering, suppliers, testing, or launch.
Next step
Tell us what you sell, who you need to reach, and which channels are already active. We will identify the clearest next step for growth—and whether product-side support is also required.